Dramatic fall in successful high court challenges to government policy

6 days ago 14

Successful precocious tribunal challenges to authorities argumentation and decisions by nationalist bodies person fallen dramatically, prompting warnings that ministers’ attacks connected lawyers could beryllium having a chilling effect connected judges.

The proportionality of civilian judicial reviews, excluding migration cases, which claimants won retired of full claims lodged fell by 50% connected 2020, according to investigation seen by the Guardian. The fig is 26% if the occurrence complaint is measured retired of cases that went to a last hearing.

The autumn took spot against a inheritance of disapproval by ministers. The lawyer general, Suella Braverman, earlier taking bureau railed against “chronic and dependable encroachment by … judges” and past twelvemonth said successful immoderate cases they had “strained the rule of parliamentary sovereignty”. The lord chancellor, Dominic Raab, has warned judges against “harpooning” authorities infrastructure projects.

Boris Johnson doubled down connected attacks connected “lefty lawyers” aft being forced to cancel the archetypal planned Rwanda deportation flight past week aft an injunction granted by the European tribunal of quality rights (ECHR) to 1 of the radical owed to beryllium removed. The premier curate responded by accusing English lawyers of “abetting the enactment of transgression gangs” who facilitated Channel crossings. Raab suggested judges astatine the ECHR had overreached.

Responding to the judicial reappraisal figures, Raab’s predecessor arsenic lord chancellor, Robert Buckland QC, said: “There’s surely a downward trajectory connected the twelvemonth earlier – whether it’s a inclination it is astir apt excessively aboriginal to say. But I would beryllium precise acrophobic if judges were feeling nether unit oregon successful immoderate mode responding straight to comments made by ministers – that would not beryllium desirable oregon appropriate.”

Buckland was sacked and replaced by Raab successful September, with galore believing helium paid the terms for not going further successful the judicial reappraisal measure to restrict challenges to government. In December, the Times was briefed that Johnson was readying to fto ministers throw retired judicial reappraisal rulings they disagreed with, though the premier minister’s spokesperson said it was “not an close characterisation”.

A study published this period by the all-party parliamentary radical connected ideology and the constitution said ministers had acted improperly by questioning the legitimacy of judges erstwhile they did not get their ain mode and that the lord chancellor and lawyer wide had failed to support the judiciary – often doing the other – arsenic the pairs’ roles had go politicised.

The figures for the precocious court, obtained using the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) online investigation tool, amusement that determination were 31 civilian judicial reviews (excluding immigration) recovered for the claimant past year, the lowest since disposable records began successful 2001, compared with 68 (the erstwhile low) successful 2020.

The occurrence complaint past twelvemonth was besides the lowest connected record, whether arsenic a proportionality of full cases lodged (2.2%) oregon those that went to a last proceeding (30%). By comparison, the mean occurrence rates betwixt 2016 and 2020 were 4.7% of full cases lodged and 38.9% of those that went to a last hearing.

Jolyon Maugham QC, manager of the Good Law Project, which identified the driblet successful the occurrence complaint and has been progressive successful high-profile judicial reviews against the authorities relating to Brexit and the VIP lane for suppliers of Covid idiosyncratic protective equipment, said determination was a hazard the regularisation of instrumentality “could easy go a relic for the past books”.

He said: “The information suggests a illness successful judicial scrutiny of the government. We cannot cognize this is due to the fact that of however ministers talk astir judges and the instrumentality – but it is not casual to place plausible alternate campaigner explanations. Privately, elder judges are worried. And they should be.”

Other observers said determination were already signs the ultimate tribunal had go much conservative. An investigation published by the UK Constitutional Law Association comparing past twelvemonth with 2020 suggested the UK’s highest tribunal present had much of “a inclination to cull quality rights claims (only 2 retired of 18 were palmy past year) and to broadside with nationalist authorities”.

In January, Patrick Hodge, the lawman president of the ultimate court, spoke astatine an lawsuit tally by the Judicial Power Project (JPP), 1 of the foremost critics of alleged judicial overreach, though helium stated that “I don’t hold with immoderate of the premises [of the JPP]”.

Jonathan Jones QC (Hon), the erstwhile caput of the authorities ineligible department, said the simplification successful the judicial reappraisal occurrence complaint “sounds significant” but it was hard to gully conclusions wherefore it had occurred. However, helium highlighted comments by Braverman and Raab, adding: “We person besides seen immoderate much government-friendly connection from the ultimate tribunal and 1 oregon 2 important decisions, eg connected standing,” (which constricted who tin situation an alleged harm).

Conor Gearty QC (Hon), barrister and prof of quality rights instrumentality astatine LSE, said portion judges did their best, “the fig of wins has ever been precise small, and present we spot a drastic simplification successful adjacent that tiny percentage”.

He added: “It is hard to debar the thought that the inheritance sound of hostility to the judges and the courts, being generated relentlessly not lone by ministers but adjacent by the lawyer wide herself, has had an effect.

Sign up to First Edition, our escaped regular newsletter – each weekday greeting astatine 7am BST

“The evident tendency of the ultimate tribunal to restrict the scope of arguments earlier the courts and to chopped backmost connected challenging socio-economic claims whitethorn besides person had immoderate effect. These are worrying times for those who spot accountability to the instrumentality arsenic an indispensable diagnostic of democracy.”

A MoJ spokesperson said: “Judicial reappraisal decisions are wholly a substance for autarkic judges, who present person greater powers to resoluteness cases successful a much flexible and applicable mode acknowledgment to our reforms.”

Three landmark judicial reappraisal cases

In 2016, the precocious tribunal ruled that parliament had to springiness its consent earlier the authorities could trigger nonfiction 50 and formally initiate Brexit, prompting disapproval by ministers and the infamous Daily Mail “Enemies of the people” headline. The determination was upheld by the ultimate court which, successful 2019, would regularisation that Boris Johnson’s prorogation of parliament during the Brexit situation was unlawful, again angering the government.

In 2017, the ultimate tribunal ruled that employment tribunal fees of up to £1,200 were inconsistent with entree to justice, forcing the Ministry of Justice to scrap the fees and entitling those who had already paid them to a refund. In the judicial reappraisal brought by the commercialized national Unison, the judges besides recovered that fees were contrary to the Equality Act 2010 arsenic they disproportionately affected women.

The government’s attempts to unit the bedroom tax connected partners of radical with terrible disabilities, which would person seen their lodging payment reduced by 14% for having a “spare” room, was ruled unlawful by the ultimate tribunal successful 2019. The judges said that applying the simplification to a antheral referred lone arsenic RR, was a breach of his close to a location nether the Human Rights Act. They said RR’s spouse was severely disabled truthful “it is accepted” that the mates needed an other chamber for her aesculapian equipment. The effect was to reconstruct afloat lodging payment to RR, and astatine slightest 155 different partners of disabled people.