Heated Debate in Arizona Secretary of State Race Highlights Political Divides

3 months ago 20

It was a blistery governmental debate, for sure, but the vigor was intelligibly connected Arizona authorities Rep. Mark Finchem, the Trump-endorsed Republican nominee for caput of authorities connected Sept. 20.

The “Big Lie” of the stolen 2020 predetermination and Jan. 6 were Arizona Horizon big Ted Simons’ large questions for Finchem during the half-hour agelong segment.

“Do you deliberation Arizona voters privation their main predetermination serviceman astatine a riot astatine the U.S. Capitol to overthrow an election?” Simons asked Finchem successful a solemn tone. “Is that what you deliberation Arizona nonmigratory elector citizens want?”

Simons was referring to Finchem’s attendance astatine the Jan. 6 protestation astatine the U.S. Capitol successful Washington past year.

Finchem, who admitted to being interviewed by the Department of Justice and the Jan. 6 Committee, changeable back, “The past I checked, [being] wherever thing is happening is not illegal. I person been treated arsenic a witness, not arsenic a suspect.”

In the Hot Seat

For the adjacent 26 minutes, astir each question would beryllium directed astatine Finchem.

It would beryllium just to accidental Finchem is not fashionable successful the bequest media. A speedy Google hunt revealed headlines alluding to his alleged conspiracy theories astir a stolen 2020 election.

One reads, “Arizona GOP caput of authorities nominee stands by predetermination conspiracy.” Another points to his alleged “fealty to the Big Lie.”

It would besides beryllium just to accidental the proverbial gloves volition stay disconnected arsenic Finchem and his Democratic opponent, Adrian Fontes, duke it retired successful the run-up to the Nov. 8 wide predetermination successful Arizona.

By his ain remarks, Fontes is nary instrumentality of Finchem successful the contention for Arizona’s apical predetermination administrator, charactering Finchem’s views astir the 2020 predetermination arsenic thing little than “dangerous.”

Fontes said during the statement that the contention is not lone astir preserving mail-in ballot voting successful Arizona; it is astir defending ideology from threats posed by “the far-right.”

Fontes, an attorney, cited Finchem’s attendance astatine the Jan. 6 protestation arsenic hard impervious of his governmental extremism.

“What [Finchem] did was prosecute successful a convulsive insurrection” resulting successful the deaths of constabulary officers, Fontes said, without notation to the protesters that died. “He is portion of an enactment that has called for the convulsive overthrow of this country,” helium repeated from claims made by voices successful the bequest media that the Trump squad is warring to challenge.

Finchem upheld his grounds arsenic a transgression justness researcher and two-term Arizona authorities typical who is moving for caput of authorities with the slogan, “Just travel the law.”

In his view, Fontes, a erstwhile Maricopa County Recorder from 2017 to 2021, created his ain predetermination instrumentality for governmental reasons portion serving successful that presumption by printing amerciable ballots.

Ballot Irregularities

Finchem said the ballots contained amerciable voting proposal and were sent retired to thousands of voters until a Superior Court justice successful Arizona blocked Fontes successful 2020.

When Arizona caput of authorities Katie Hobbs, the 2022 Democratic nominee for governor, got upwind of Fontes’ action, she penned a missive calling it illegal.

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich filed suit aft the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and Hobbs said Fontes ignored their orders not to message retired the ballots.

“The Maricopa County Recorder cannot unilaterally rewrite authorities predetermination laws,” Brnovich said successful a property release.

“Fontes is creating chaos successful our elections during an already hard time. In times of crisis, the nationalist looks to our elected officials to travel the law—not marque reactionary decisions for governmental gain.”

Fontes said successful the statement that grounds of ballot fraud of a magnitude to overturn the 2020 predetermination successful Arizona “doesn’t exist” and that “it’s clip to determination distant [and] not rehash aged issues.”

“He [Finchem] wants to halt the capableness to ballot by mail,” added Fontes, calling ideology “a decision.”

Finchem past responded, “We request to physique confidence. We request a caput of authorities who follows the law, not constitution instrumentality arsenic helium goes along.”

Country Before Party

At slightest 1 Republican Arizona lawmaker has travel retired successful enactment of Fontes.

In his endorsement, authorities Rep. Joel John compared Fontes to nationalist heroes who “bravely stood up to bash what was close adjacent if it wasn’t fashionable successful their respective camps.”

“We request much radical similar that today. I americium arrogant to enactment Adrian Fontes and articulation noble Republicans and Independents who are consenting to enactment state earlier party.

John described Fontes’ opponent, without naming him, arsenic “someone who wants to get escaped of voting by message and has sought to overturn the 2020 election.”

Recent polls amusement Finchem starring Fontes by astatine slightest 5 percent points.

In September, OH Predictive Insights showed Finchem up 40-35 percent, portion the dispersed was thinner at 31-28 percent among independents.

Allan Stein


Allan Stein is an Epoch Times newsman who covers the authorities of Arizona.