Liberals’ Plan to Curb ‘Internet Harms’ Puts Free Speech at Risk: Expert

1 month ago 22

The Liberal government’s upcoming authorities to code “online harms” could undermine Canadians’ state of code and render diasporas from authoritarian countries much vulnerable, says the manager of an net information advocacy group.

Between July 27 and Sept. 25, the national authorities held public consultations connected its connection to present caller legislative and regulatory frameworks for social media platforms that purpose to code 5 categories of “harmful content” online: hatred speech, violent content, contented that incites violence, kid intersexual exploitation, and non-consensual sharing of intimate images.

The Liberal Party’s level for the 2021 national predetermination promised to present the authorities wrong the archetypal 100 days if re-elected.

Philip Palmer, manager of the Internet Society Canada Chapter, said the projected authorities poses a imaginable menace to Canadians’ charter-protected rights.

“I person a fig of concerns, but the superior 1 is that it volition pb to over-censorship of contented connected the internet,” Palmer told The Epoch Times.

“The definitions are loose, the entities to which it is to use are unclear, and the value of the applications of authorities volition pb to an over-application of the criteria for harmful content.”

Palmer notes that the proposal’s 24-hour clip bounds for societal media companies similar Facebook and Twitter to instrumentality down flagged contented is structurally geared toward censorship.

“That clip unit positive the sanctions that tin beryllium applied to economical and reputational [damage to a company] each thrust successful favour of suppressing contented alternatively than permitting content,” helium said.

A vague explanation of what constitutes “harm” successful each class whitethorn besides encroach upon escaped speech, since otherwise-lawful code that is deemed violative to definite radical could go criminalized nether the caller legislation, Palmer explained.

“Democratic statement and societal statement person ne'er been confined to the polite shallow speech—it has ever engaged passions, emotions, overstatement, over-representation, satire, irony—all of which tin beryllium objectionable to immoderate radical successful immoderate groups—but it’s not illegal, it’s not criminal,” helium said.

“The thrust of this authorities volition beryllium to suppress code that is astatine the margins of polite speech oregon beyond the margins of polite conversation, but nevertheless lawful.”

The Epoch Times reached retired to Heritage Canada for remark but did not perceive backmost by the clip of publication.

Broadening Internet Control

The authorities has made respective legislative attempts to modulate contented connected the net successful the past year, specified arsenic done Bill C-10 and Bill C-36, some of which proved controversial.

Epoch Times Photo Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault during a quality league successful Ottawa, April 17, 2020. (The Canadian Press/Adrian Wyld)

Bill C-10, introduced by erstwhile Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault successful November 2020, projected to bring net contented providers nether the regularisation of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission. The authorities sought to modulate streaming services similar Netflix successful areas specified arsenic Canadian contented and tax-collection requirements.

The measure became arguable erstwhile it was amended to see user-generated contented connected societal media platforms.

“[Bill C-10] got into occupation successful the House of Commons and was facing fierce absorption successful the Senate owed to its trenching connected societal media platforms—expression by backstage citizens successful the signifier of postings to societal media,” Palmer said.

“It’s wide that successful taking connected streaming services—and again streaming services are not intelligibly defined—they’re seeking to modulate on-demand content. … That’s a wide and deliberate march into an country that antecedently was unregulated.”

Bill C-36 projected to let individuals to record a ailment with the Canadian Human Rights Commission if they acquisition “hate” online, including hatred crimes and hatred speech. Hatred is defined arsenic an “emotion that involves detestation oregon vilification and that is stronger than dislike oregon disdain.”

In a caller article published connected the Macdonald-Laurier Institute’s website, Palmer noted that the bills present a “host of ineligible and argumentation concerns” including the imaginable for extra-territorial reach.

“The harmful code could beryllium successful a overseas language, connected a overseas level and interaction a idiosyncratic oregon persons extracurricular Canada—yet the caller regulations would inactive use to that content,” helium wrote.

“Canada would fundamentally beryllium asserting jurisdiction implicit the full Internet.”

Hacking Risk

In opposition to the Conservative government’s Bill C-30 (Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act) of 2012, which allowed instrumentality enforcement agencies to inquire backstage organizations to voluntarily supply idiosyncratic accusation without consent, the Liberals’ connection would necessitate societal media companies to proactively study individuals whose online activities are deemed harmful.

That backstage accusation reported to instrumentality enforcement oregon nationalist information would beryllium kept successful machine databases, which could beryllium susceptible to hacking by authoritarian regimes, thereby facilitating these countries’ power of their diaspora, Palmer said.

“Russia, China, Iran person each provided wide grounds that they tin hack into a full batch of databases, and they whitethorn successful that mode beryllium capable to scoop accusation astir individuals, and peculiarly concerning would beryllium successful individuals who are progressive successful oppositional groups,” helium said.

Palmer added, however, that he’s optimistic improvements volition beryllium made to the legislation, particularly fixed that “some of the advocacy groups that are ordinarily lined up with the government, successful this lawsuit are besides expressing interest astir the deficiency of definitions.”

“I stay optimistic that the authorities volition retreat from immoderate of the much egregious proposals that they’ve made, and mean it specified that we’ll person effectual authorities that volition really support Canadians from immoderate existent harms connected the internet,” helium said.

Andrew Chen


Andrew Chen is an Epoch Times newsman based successful Toronto.

More articles from this author