The caput of a writer is simply a unusual place, and a enigma writer’s caput is the strangest of all. How does 1 usage a myriad of tiny intersecting events to conception a crippled that volition puzzle, entertain, surprise, and yet fulfill the reader? Carla Valentine reveals the processes by which that mistress of misdirection, Agatha Christie, utilized what we present notation to arsenic forensics to lend some credibility and complexity to her celebrated stories.
During the archetypal satellite war, Christie worked successful a infirmary dispensary, wherever she learned to premix medicines from precisely measured and often unsafe ingredients. She was, arsenic her autobiography enactment it, “surrounded by poisons”. Inspired by the adventures of Sherlock Holmes, it was present that her thoughts turned to detective fiction, and she planned her archetypal novel, The Mysterious Affair astatine Styles, a clever and devious lawsuit of execution by strychnine poisoning.
Following the occurrence of this novel, Christie decided to spell beyond poisons and thoroughly familiarise herself with emerging technological techniques that were changing the probe of crime. Valentine has employed her skills arsenic a forensic mortuary technician to tease retired the good details of however Christie wove this cognition into her stories.
Valentine’s publication besides serves arsenic an exploration of those techniques, including the postulation of fingerprints, the mentation of impressions similar footprints oregon tyre tracks, the investigation of bloodstains and, astatine the autopsy stage, of the victims themselves. In immoderate areas, notably fingerprints, Christie’s novels, possibly arsenic a effect of her conversations with experts, anticipated innovations earlier they were formally adopted.
Which is not to accidental that her characters slavishly ever followed the rules. While Hercule Poirot, a nonrecreational detective, displayed his expertise successful fingerprints from the start, Miss Marple, an amateur, was fixed to improvisation. In The Case of the Perfect Maid she sneakily collected a suspect’s fingerprints utilizing lone a pouch reflector and a portion of half-eaten seaside rock. And Poirot himself often disdained the signifier – articulated by renowned French criminologist Edmond Locard arsenic “‘every interaction leaves a trace” – of searching for tiny pieces of evidence, preferring to prevarication backmost successful an armchair with his eyes closed successful bid to spot the solution with “the eyes of the mind”.
Christie’s probe and attraction to item makes her enactment believable, and she brought the latest successful forensic subject to nationalist attention. She was an avid scholar of paper reports of transgression cases and engaged successful progressive statement with different eminent transgression writers, exchanging ideas and accusation astatine their meetings successful the Detection Club, founded successful 1930.
Occasionally, arsenic a storyteller, she bent the rules. Like Sherlock Holmes, she suggests that the look connected the look of a corpse tin uncover however the idiosyncratic died, and their emotions astatine the clip of death. Christie indispensable person known that this is not the case, but we tin let her immoderate melodramatic license, and for the astir part, she was scrupulously accurate.
Valentine has written an engaging and informative publication (the Murder Methods Table is grimly fascinating, with 1939’s And Then There Were None claiming the prize for the top diversity, from crushing to drowning). She casts caller airy connected Christie’s methods and probe and, astir importantly, makes definite ne'er to springiness distant the endings.