Paul Pelosi attack: rightwing pundits backtrack after release of police video

1 month ago 35

Conservative commentators were forced to backtrack implicit conspiracy theories and jokes astir the hammer onslaught connected Paul Pelosi, aft the release of constabulary video and audio past week.

One Fox News commentator had to retreat from his assertion determination was nary “evidence of a breaking and entering” erstwhile his big pointed retired that footage of the attacker breaking into Pelosi’s location was playing connected surface astatine the time.

“Got it,” Brian Claypool said. “Yeah. OK. Can’t we speech much astir what is the DoJ doing?”

The Department of Justice has charged Pelosi’s attacker, David DePape, with battle and attempted kidnapping. The 42-year-old besides faces authorities charges including attempted murder. He has pleaded not guilty.

Pelosi, 82, was attacked successful his San Francisco location successful precocious October, a clip erstwhile his wife, Nancy Pelosi, was inactive talker of the US House. According to tapes released by the police, the attacker said helium was looking for her. She was not present. Her hubby suffered a fractured skull and injuries to his manus and arm.

Republican leaders including Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell condemned the attack.

But salient rightwingers including Donald Trump Jr, the Fox News big Tucker Carlson, the Tesla and Twitter proprietor Elon Musk and Republican members of Congress including Ted Cruz and Marjorie Taylor Greene eagerly dispersed jokes, misinformation and conspiracy theories.

Joe Biden said specified reactions showed the Republicans were “extremely extreme”.

Jill Filipovic, a Guardian columnist, wrote that though the onslaught “should daze the conscience of the federation … it has shown conscionable however immune to quality decency and empathy the Trumpist close has become”.

Last week, a justice successful San Francisco ordered the merchandise of constabulary and surveillance footage. On Friday, the footage played wide connected TV and online.

Musk said sorry – successful reply to a tweet successful which Juanita Broaddrick, an writer who accuses Bill Clinton of rape, said the Pelosi footage showed what was “still a questionable and bizarre concern betwixt 2 men successful their underwear”. Other users pointed retired that the footage showed neither antheral was wearing lone underwear.

Perhaps the astir awkward reaction, however, came from Claypool, who according to his ain website is “a nationally regarded proceedings attorney, trusted media personality, and a genuine state to those who person endured intersexual maltreatment and faced civilian injustice”.

Referring to a conspiracy mentation which holds that Pelosi fto DePape into his home, Claypool said: “The question they’ve not talked astir is, and cipher wants to speech about, but let’s bash it, is did Paul Pelosi cognize this guy?”

Claypool pointed to the information the footage shows Pelosi with a portion successful his hand. The commentator besides claimed a 911 telephone besides released showed Pelosi to beryllium “kind of passively successful fear, it didn’t dependable similar helium was successful fearfulness for his life”.

Things started to spell incorrect for Claypool erstwhile his Fox News host, Sandra Smith, said: “Wasn’t that an effort to support the attacker calm, potentially?

“I deliberation that’s the mode a batch of america interpreted that 911 telephone … that this was idiosyncratic who had 911 connected the enactment and that Pelosi was trying to convey that helium was successful distress, that helium was successful contiguous danger, without escalating the concern with the attacker.

“And, by the way, there’s wide footage … extracurricular of the house, showing this attacker breaking done the solid windows connected the broadside of the house.”

Fox News rolled the footage.

CCTV footage shows David DePape breaking into Paul Pelosi's location – video

“I‘m not saying that I invited this upon him,” Claypool said. “What I’m talking astir is we conscionable privation transparency implicit what happened. Why did it instrumentality truthful agelong to get the video footage?”

Instead of cutting his losses there, Claypool switched tack.

“The different issue,” helium said, “is, look, wherever is the grounds of a breaking and entering?”

Smith said: “There’s video of him breaking into the house.”

Claypool said: “I haven’t seen video of him breaking into the house.”

Smith said: “It’s connected the surface close now. I presume it’s with the hammer you aboriginal spot [the attacker] with. This is wide video that we person been fixed extracurricular of the house. The attacker is connected the close broadside of the screen, breaking done the house.”

Claypool said: “Got it.”

Smith’s co-host, John Roberts, said: “He’s intelligibly utilizing that to interruption in.”

Claypool said: “Yeah. OK. But can’t we speech much astir what is the DoJ doing?”

The lawyer past attempted to comparison justness section attraction of the Pelosi onslaught with “the Hunter Biden thing, with the Mar-a-Lago hunt warrant” – cardinal Republican onslaught lines astir the behaviour of the president’s lad and an FBI raid connected Donald Trump’s location successful hunt of classified documents.

Claypool insisted helium was “not questioning” that Paul Pelosi “feared for himself”. But, helium said: “All I’m saying is simply a implicit deficiency of transparency again, by the DoJ and radical conscionable privation transparency connected high-profile investigations involving high-profile Democratic officials.”